Politics Vs Economics

regime vs economics2004Hayek is one of representatives and the biggest figure in neo-Austrian economical chair aim (variant of monetarism , one of the brightest defenders of part with-market conception and non-intervention of presidency into economics , critic of socialist economy , communism , etatism andHayek about modernization of politics : law against directives . When we equal with affirmation of J . Bjunekken about superior importance of natural choice , we need to examine which principles should be in the instauration of constitution of political life . permit s see the ideas of famous economist Fredrick Fon Hayek which find reflection in his monograph The genius of self-direction (1960In case Bjunekken examines groups of lobbyists pressure as growth of spontaneous self-establishment of civil society , Hayek e stimates it much more critic eithery . He indicates that organization of influential groups of special interests is im practicable without avail of government . Besides because it is principally impossible to organize all interests organization of decided groups leads with help of government to constant developing of non-organized groups and groups which send packing non be organized . Victims in this process start out such groups as consumers in common , tax-payers , women , elderly flock and many others (Gamble 2000 169-189Such prohibit estimation of groups of special interests gave possibility to Hayek to expression critically at the very democratic government . He wrote that any condition (force ) should be limited , but specially it concerns democratic ply . Omnipotent democratic government hardly due to plenum of its strength becomes a toy in hand of organized interests , because it should ravish them , in order to provide pay of majorityBasing on this , Hayek makes cultivation that main purpose of cons! titutional rules is unappeasable limitation of rights and powers of primal power , doesn t matter which democratic lineage it could have Hayek proposed to distinguish laws as universal rules , which can be applied to terra incognita number of collisions , possible in the nearest proximo and directives for definite claims .

Only constant , stable and universally accept schema of rules can limit possibility of legalized corruption - establishment chthonian pressure of different lobbies of parliament (or presidential ) directives , plentiful in the name of political union special privilegesIn his sacred s cripture The Constitution of Freedom Hayek determines freedom as absence of fixation (Sufrin 1961 , 201-204 . We can easily clear that he is quite free in choice of determination , but it is difficult to understand its smell out , in case we will not make pass water term , opposite to freedom - compulsion . Hayek proposes to determine compulsion as right of arbitrary government , he insists that it should be monopolized by the government and therefore after brought up to tokenish . He notices also that it is possible to allow only receipts and definite limited forms of political performance , executed in the interests of societyMany other supporters of economical liberalism , who gain t accept governmental activity in no appearance , - even in those strictly limited spheres , in which Hayek allows it , - speak about hesitations concerning Hayek s orthodoxy (Rees 1963 , 346-360 . But those fears were dead because Hayek would never accept that government...If you p ostulate to get a in force(p) essay, order it on our! website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay