A commentary on '700 Intellektuelle beten einen Oeltank an'

Commentary of 700 Intellektuelle beten einen Öltank anThe verse 700 Intellektuelle... was pen by Bertolt Brecht in juvenile 1927; an plosive in which industrialization was looming after a period of economical depression. This poesy was initially published in the literary biannual called Prisma in Zenith in betimes 1928 and then in a magazine by the name of Simplicissimus in early 1929. It have as part of a collection of rimes by Brecht in the Versuche series and was placed under the heading Aus dem Lesebuch für Städtebewohner. This circumstanceual information regarding the rime domiciliate help oneself allow extra means to the meter as strong as as well as analyzing the text itself. I now plan to light-headed how the text helps do meaning for the contributor and likewise how another(prenominal) contextual information can besides provide additional information to help understand the verse in more depth. First of all, the form of this verse form is kinda striking. The verse form consists of 9 stanzas, in which in that location 49 verses unequally distributed. Of these 49 verses, there atomic number 18 26 convicts and 28 cla physical exertions. This unsystematic sentence statistical distribution whitethorn have been apply for effect by Brecht for stress as seen with the unmatchable naked as a jaybirdsworthiness on inventory 12; Öltank. Brecht does not come along to use regular rhythm patterns but, on the contrary, uses breaks in rhythm for savoir-faire pattern of shorter verses as seen on simple eye 43. to a fault inconsistent is the sentence structure with sentence lengths set forth from one word to thirty-four words and ?enjambement? is likewise a salient feature, possibly to accuse some front of irregularity ab surface the Öltank. There ar quite a number of stylistic features used by Brecht in this poem to get meaning. The use of a paradox on earpiece circuit 24 referring to the Öltank as Häß licher and Schönste in age could imply an ! nervous strain of confusion or possibly of apprehension of the Intellektuellen. another(prenominal) technique employed by Brecht is that of head rhyme, which is firstborn seen on run along 5. The effect of the ?v? sound is quite interesting as it could be considered as onomatopoeic and identical to the howling of the wind. other example of alliteration is on get 33 and in this case, we see the vowel alliteration of the phoneme, which creates a more period sound, nevertheless increasing the effect of enjambment employed by Brecht. In addition to alliteration, the poem seems to jibe aspects of a prayer. This is shown by the pass address of the poem; it is clear that the poem is tell at somebody with its stag uses of ?Du?, ?dich? and of the supreme form too, as is seen on banknote 26 ?Tue? and attract 28 with ?Lösche?. Also, the choice of vocabulary on line 30, ?wie du willst? and line 55, ?darum ehöre uns?dem Übel des Geistes? seem comparable to those found in a prayer and add to the quality that the 700 Intellektuelle in the poem whitethornbe feel that the Öltank represents and is a sign on for a bracing belief and indeed speak in such a manner as to worship it. It can be argued that the Öltank, depict in juxtaposition with nature and the products of it, ein Gras, Elfenbein, Ebenholz?in order to create bloodline, is symbolic of industrialisation, especially with the point that the Öltank is do out of Eisen; a material used in bulky quantities in industriousness. In the last line of the poem, it appears that Brecht deliberately misspells a word to create the word hybridizationschritt, which can be seen as a direct reference towards the motor company Ford and surely as an attempt by Brecht to single out the company as spearheading industrialisation. It is seeming(a) that the Intellektuellen do not seem to be phased by the overnight arrival of an Öltank as there is only one question in the whole poem addressed to what seems to be a symbol of a new belief, which could imply an ai! r of predictability surrounding industrialisation in the consciousness of calculation and Statistik. The poem seems to raise issues combining industry and creed. Firstly, industry is implied on frequent occasions in the poem, especially with the lexical field of industry, Eisen, Elektrifizierung, Statistik?.The concomitant that the Intellektuellen ask to be saved from the abhorrence of the mind in the name of Elektrifizierung, etc shows that they are putting their faith in, in this case, electrification; the briny power source behind industry. This mountain chain of industrialisation is encourage stressed when placed in contrast to images of the old focussing of life, such as the windmills, die langsam mahlen, which is actually a biblical reference to the expression, Gottes Mühlen mahlen langsam and in turn, implies to the reader the notion of faith. Also in line with the theme of faith, there is the phrase, Herrlich! Herrlich! Herrlich!

on line 36, which is a phrase heard in church and also refers to the fact that the Öltank is made out of Eisen further strengthening the stem of a faith in industrialisation. It is apparent that Brecht would like to capture that this new faith in industrialisation has brought about a replacement of God for science and calculation, the references of which are frequent with the lexical field of calculation, Berechnung, nicht unendlich, Unscheinbarer. Moving on to the context of the poem, it can be claimed that Brecht?s relocation to Berlin in 1924 may have disposed him an idea of the industrial activity that was misfortune in Berlin and thus could have encouraged him to wr ite this poem. nearly the year of 1926, Brecht alleg! edly started to compose his own idea of chivalrous poem Theatre which was first seen in his Anmerkungen zur Oper ?Aufstieg und Fall der Stadt Mahagonny? in 1930 and, although the principles of Epic Theatre may have just been pocket to theatre, could have transpired this notion into the poem with his use of language, which could be an commentary to why there is wee personification of the Öltank even though it is conveyed as some crystallize of ?God?. In cost of literary context, the poem was written in the era of Neue Sachlichkeit; a movement which came about as a reaction to Expressionism, which aimed to foil reality according to the generator in more gloomy terms which may explain the lack of a verse in this poem and also only 8 adjectives and procedural nouns in the whole passage. In conclusion, Brecht created meaning in this poem with his use of irregular sentence structure teamed with ?enjambment? in order to create emphasis on certain words. Stylistically, allitera tion is used as twist to create a flowing sound and as onomatopoeia. The fact that the poem resembles the style of a prayer helps tie in with the theme of faith that crops up in this poem and in particular, the faith in industrialisation. In terms of contextual influence, Brecht?s location in Berlin may have been the most potent factor. Also notable are the development of his notion of Epic Theatre and the literary background knowledge of Neue Sachlichkeit. BibliographyRitchie, J.M, Periods in German publications (London: Oswald Wolff, 1968) If you want to get a full-of-the-moon essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay